RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04871
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Washington, Missouri, to Las Vegas, Nevada.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His family moved from Missouri to Nevada and he plans to live with his family upon separation from the Air Force.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 7 Nov 08, the applicant initialed/signed the DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP), listing his HOR as Washington, (Franklin) Missouri.
On 17 Feb 09, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 1 Nov 13, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge and credited with 4 years, 8 months, and 15 days of active service. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his HOR at time of entry is reflected as Washington (Franklin) MO.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR and Place of Entry (POE). In accordance with Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, the place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR (applicants records revealed no break in service). The HOR is the location identified by the individual upon entering the service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully justified. AFPC confirmed that the applicant initialed the DD Form 4/1 dated 7 Nov 08, Washington, (Franklin), Missouri as his HOR.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04871 in Executive Session on 2 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 13.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 21 Nov 13.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14.
3
1
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01593
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01593 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Place of Enlistment (POE) and Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Desoto, Texas 75115. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The home of record on his DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, be changed from Eugene Oregon to Gold Beach, Oregon. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02309
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant initialed the DD Form 4, dated 28 June 2002, listing Las Vegas, NV as his HOR. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Yokota AB, Japan to Tinker AFB, OK. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00522
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicants military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicants HOR. The applicant argues that his home of record (HOR), as...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03581
According to item 7(b) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his home of record at time of entry reflects Glendale (Maricopa), AZ. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02696
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4, dated 13 Sep 05, which lists Largo, Florida as his HOR. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621
The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...